Bring SEND records, support plans, interventions, sensory and communication evidence, wellbeing information and controlled safeguarding workflows into one connected learner journey.
EdiWay helps authorised staff organise evidence, coordinate reviews and involve families and professionals while keeping sensitive information separated by purpose and permission.
The platform supports educational and safeguarding workflows. It does not diagnose conditions, make statutory decisions or determine safeguarding outcomes.
Learning, communication, sensory needs, attendance, behaviour, wellbeing, and safeguarding can affect the same learner.
That does not mean every record belongs in the same place or should be visible to the same people.
EdiWay connects relevant evidence while preserving the purpose and permissions of each information area.
Organise educational needs, support plans, provision, interventions, adjustments and review evidence.
Record appropriate wellbeing information, check-ins, support actions and relevant learner context.
Maintain concerns, chronology, evidence and follow-up within a separately controlled information domain.
Invite appropriate parent and carer evidence without silently turning family observations into school findings.
Allow authorised practitioners to contribute through defined learner-specific relationships.
Keep diagnosis, safeguarding findings, statutory decisions and formal professional judgement with appropriately authorised people.
SEND support is rarely one document or one assessment.
EdiWay helps schools bring together relevant learner information, support evidence and review activity in a more structured workflow.
Maintain relevant school-held SEN information and current support status.
Record appropriate educational areas of need and support context.
Bring strengths, barriers, communication needs and helpful approaches into an accessible learner view.
Capture concerns that may require SENCO or support-team review.
Coordinate APDR-style cycles with evidence, actions, responsibilities and review dates.
Maintain structured school support plans and agreed educational strategies.
Connect planned support and provision to the relevant learner and review period.
Record planned activity, delivery, evidence and human-reviewed outcomes.
Keep earlier evidence visible when support is reviewed or changed.
EdiWay can help schools organise an APDR-style process without making automated decisions about SEND status or entitlement.
Bring together appropriate classroom evidence, observations, assessment information, learner views and family contributions.
Record agreed outcomes, strategies, provision, responsible people and review dates.
Track the support or teaching response that has been delivered.
Consider current evidence, progress, delivery and the learner’s wider context.
Record the authorised next step while preserving earlier cycles.
Link appropriate resources, interventions, observations and professional contributions.
The cycle remains led by authorised school staff. EdiWay helps organise the workflow and evidence around that decision-making.
Support plans become more useful when the people responsible for delivery can understand what has been agreed and when it should be reviewed.
Keep the learner’s strengths, aspirations and important support priorities visible.
Record clear educational outcomes and review criteria.
Document agreed classroom approaches and reasonable adjustments.
Record relevant support, frequency, responsibility and delivery context.
Make ownership and delivery expectations visible to authorised users.
Identify when the plan should be reconsidered.
Include appropriate contributions without removing their source.
Connect relevant external evidence where an authorised relationship exists.
Retain earlier plans and reviews rather than silently replacing them.
Intervention records should make it easier to understand the support a learner received and what evidence was available at review.
Define the purpose, learner, intended outcome and support approach.
Record relevant baseline or contextual evidence.
Track planned and recorded delivery where enabled.
Identify who is responsible for providing or reviewing the intervention.
Connect relevant outcomes, observations and learner evidence.
Record appropriate progress information at review.
Allow the authorised reviewer to record whether the support appears to be helping and what should happen next.
Make missed sessions, incomplete evidence or overdue reviews visible where supported.
Connect relevant provision-cost information where configured without implying that cost alone determines effectiveness.
Intervention reporting can describe recorded delivery and change. It should not claim that the intervention caused an outcome unless the evidence genuinely supports that conclusion.
Useful SEND support should be based on understandable evidence rather than isolated labels.
EdiWay can connect different types of authorised evidence to the learner journey.
Record educational observations from the classroom and school environment.
Connect relevant learning evidence where appropriate.
Use authorised academic or educational-profile information.
Allow parents and carers to contribute relevant observations or documents.
Record the learner’s own experience, preferences, strengths and goals where appropriate.
Connect reports or observations from authorised practitioners.
Link evidence gathered during a defined support period.
Preserve where, when and by whom evidence was recorded.
Keep the source of each contribution clear.
Evidence from different sources can be considered together without pretending that every contributor made the same judgement.
EdiWay supports structured sensory evidence designed to help schools and families understand patterns, strengths, barriers and helpful approaches.
Invite a linked parent or carer to contribute through an approved sensory workflow.
Record relevant sensory experiences and responses.
Capture where and when an observation occurred.
Describe the circumstances around a challenging or successful experience.
Record what was observed without assuming the cause.
Identify adjustments, strategies or environmental changes that appeared useful.
Keep positive sensory experiences and learner preferences visible.
Allow families to contribute relevant priorities and aspirations.
Connect reviewed sensory evidence to observations, interventions or support planning.
Keep sharing and access appropriately controlled.
Sensory information is educational support evidence. EdiWay does not provide a clinical sensory-processing diagnosis.
Communication support should begin with the learner’s actual strengths, preferences and barriers. EdiWay can organise structured educational communication information across relevant contexts.
Record appropriate observations about understanding spoken, written or supported communication.
Capture how the learner communicates ideas, needs and choices.
Record relevant interaction context without imposing a deficit-only model.
Identify formats, approaches and tools that help the learner participate.
Connect relevant sensory information where it affects communication.
Share approved communication approaches with responsible staff.
Include relevant home observations and successful approaches.
Allow authorised speech-and-language or other practitioners to contribute within an approved relationship.
The communication profile is an educational support record. It does not diagnose a speech, language or communication condition.
EdiWay can organise educational evidence relating to literacy and dyslexia-related learning profiles.
Record relevant information about fluency, decoding and comprehension.
Capture appropriate evidence relating to written expression and spelling.
Record educational indicators where relevant.
Include suitable classroom or assessment evidence without presenting it as a clinical finding.
Record relevant observations about pace, task demands and support strategies.
Keep learner strengths and successful approaches visible.
Connect relevant literacy support and later review evidence.
Review how educational evidence changes over time.
A literacy or dyslexia-related profile can indicate areas requiring further consideration. It does not provide a formal diagnosis of dyslexia.
Some learners experience significant barriers when demands interact with autonomy, anxiety, sensory load, communication or current capacity.
EdiWay supports a needs-led educational model focused on understanding context and identifying approaches that may help.
Record relevant learner context and agreed educational approaches.
Capture how manageable a situation or demand felt at a particular time.
Record what was happening before a difficulty arose.
Document strategies designed to reduce unnecessary pressure or increase participation.
Review whether an agreed approach appeared helpful.
Keep parent and carer observations separately attributed.
Allow appropriate practitioner contributions within defined permissions.
Connect reviewed evidence to APDR-style support planning where authorised.
EdiWay does not diagnose Pathological Demand Avoidance or calculate a PDA score.
Wellbeing information can help authorised staff understand how a learner is experiencing school and whether further human support may be useful.
Capture age-appropriate learner responses where enabled.
Maintain relevant pastoral support information and review history.
Record educational and support information relating to social, emotional and mental-health needs.
Organise agreed wellbeing or pastoral support actions.
Connect appropriate family involvement to the support journey.
Maintain permitted school-held information while respecting professional confidentiality boundaries.
Record relevant involvement from approved services or professionals.
Assign actions, owners and review dates.
Review recorded wellbeing information without turning changes into automatic clinical conclusions.
EdiWay supports school wellbeing workflows. It does not diagnose a mental-health condition or replace clinical services.
Support should not be built entirely around what adults record about a learner. Where appropriate, EdiWay can help capture the learner’s own perspective.
What the learner feels is going well.
Activities, subjects or environments that support engagement.
Challenges the learner wants adults to understand.
Strategies, people, environments or adjustments the learner finds useful.
What the learner wants to achieve next.
How they prefer information, questions or choices to be presented.
Whether the learner feels an agreed support strategy is helping.
Learner voice should be interpreted with appropriate age, communication needs, capacity and safeguarding responsibilities in mind.
Parents and carers may hold valuable knowledge about the learner’s strengths, communication, sensory needs, wellbeing and experience outside school.
EdiWay gives families controlled routes to contribute.
Invite relevant observations and priorities.
Allow authorised family contributions to sensory workflows.
Request views before an APDR-style or other school review.
Invite relevant family contributions to review preparation.
Capture appropriate information from outside school.
Record family goals and priorities alongside learner voice.
Allow selected evidence to be contributed where enabled.
Keep appropriate consent, visibility and revocation information with the workflow.
Preserve family evidence as family evidence.
A parent contribution does not automatically become a school assessment, SEND decision or safeguarding finding.
Educational psychologists, speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, counsellors, tutors and other approved professionals may contribute useful evidence.
EdiWay supports external participation through defined learner-specific relationships.
Connect the professional or organisation to an approved learner purpose where enabled.
Limit access to the information required for that work.
Set an appropriate review or expiry period.
Request relevant contributions without opening unrelated records.
Coordinate authorised reviews, tasks and follow-up activity.
Preserve the professional’s contribution as their own evidence.
Remove access when the relationship ends.
Allow the responsible school user to consider professional evidence before it affects school-held support records.
External professional access remains controlled and should not be described as unrestricted multi-agency access.
Safeguarding requires stronger information boundaries than ordinary learner support. EdiWay treats safeguarding as a separately controlled information domain.
Allow authorised staff to record a safeguarding concern through the appropriate workflow.
Preserve what was observed, reported or disclosed.
Use configured categories where appropriate.
Keep sensitive information limited to authorised users.
Build a source-linked chronological history of relevant safeguarding activity where enabled.
Connect approved safeguarding evidence with appropriate controls.
Record responsible people, actions, deadlines and outcomes.
Give designated safeguarding users an appropriate view of concerns and follow-up activity.
Maintain relevant information about external referrals where the workflow is enabled.
Retain an appropriate history of important safeguarding actions and access.
EdiWay helps schools organise concerns, chronology, evidence and follow-up. It does not determine whether abuse has occurred, automatically calculate safeguarding risk, or make safeguarding findings.
Safeguarding information can become difficult to understand when concerns, actions, documents and referrals are stored separately.
A controlled chronology can help authorised safeguarding staff understand the sequence of recorded activity.
Keep the source and date of each concern visible.
Add relevant authorised evidence without rewriting the original record.
Record what action was taken, by whom and when.
Keep relevant external-referral activity connected to the case where enabled.
Record authorised review and closure information.
Connect approved supporting records.
Preserve earlier information when later evidence changes the school’s understanding.
Select only the information appropriate for an authorised disclosure or evidence pack where supported.
Safeguarding chronologies should support trained professional review rather than automated conclusions.
A behaviour event, attendance pattern, or wellbeing concern may sometimes require safeguarding consideration. It should not automatically become a safeguarding finding.
Keep the behaviour, attendance or wellbeing information in its original context.
Allow an authorised member of staff to refer relevant information for safeguarding review.
Use configured categories where appropriate.
Do not expose the safeguarding record back into ordinary behaviour or pastoral views.
Retain the appropriate safeguarding action or decision in the controlled domain.
Avoid automatically relabelling educational, SEND or pastoral records as safeguarding records.
Where enabled, EdiWay AI may help authorised safeguarding users prepare controlled working drafts from information they are permitted to access.
Help organise permitted information into a working chronological draft.
Add relevant authorised evidence without rewriting the original record.
Prepare appropriate draft communications where permitted.
Highlight records or actions that may require human attention.
Keep the relevant source context visible where supported.
Every output remains a draft for authorised human review.
A learner may have SEND and safeguarding needs at the same time. That does not mean every teacher, SENCO, professional or family member should see both records.
Supports educational planning, provision and review.
Supports a separately controlled safeguarding process.
May support pastoral understanding without automatically creating a safeguarding concern.
Records school events and responses without proving underlying need.
Remains separately controlled according to the user’s responsibility.
Is available only within the approved purpose and relationship.
Retains its source and approved sharing context.
EdiWay is designed to connect the learner journey without flattening these boundaries.
Access to SEND, wellbeing and safeguarding information should follow responsibility and purpose.
Access relevant classroom strategies and learner-support context without automatically seeing sensitive safeguarding information.
Coordinate appropriate SEND records, support plans, provision and reviews.
Work with permitted wellbeing and pastoral information.
Access controlled safeguarding concerns, chronology and follow-up.
Receive appropriate oversight without assuming unrestricted access to every confidential record.
See approved information relating to their linked child and contribute through defined family workflows.
Access age-appropriate support information where enabled.
Contribute through a defined learner relationship and information scope.
Support the platform without automatically receiving professional case authority.
Connected support works best when the source of evidence remains clear.
Records created and maintained through authorised school workflows.
Professional observations and classroom evidence.
Information provided by parents or carers.
The learner’s own views and contributions.
Reports and contributions from authorised external practitioners.
Information deliberately made available through an approved sharing process.
Restricted records governed through safeguarding permissions.
Documents and decisions originating from the responsible statutory organisation.
Connecting evidence should not erase who created it or silently change its authority.
A learner’s school, support needs and professional relationships may change over time.
EdiWay is designed to help authorised users prepare appropriate evidence for transitions without simply opening the complete learner record.
Carry relevant strategies and reviewed support information forward.
Prepare selected transition evidence through controlled workflows.
Keep school and family evidence appropriately source-separated.
Connect authorised information where the learner receives additional support.
Review and revoke access when external involvement ends.
Connect appropriate support evidence to preparation-for-adulthood activity.
Move towards learner-controlled continuity where the relevant pathway is enabled.
Where enabled, EdiWay AI can help authorised users prepare working drafts using information already within their permitted context.
Prepare a starting point from selected educational evidence.
Organise permitted evidence before an APDR-style or annual review.
Help prepare clear draft updates for authorised review.
Structure possible support actions as a working draft.
Prepare a source-aware description of relevant evidence.
Organise agreed points and actions.
Help authorised safeguarding users structure permitted chronology information without making findings.
Highlight information that may need further human review. AI outputs remain drafts.
An authorised person must review the evidence, proposed wording, permissions and next action before anything becomes part of an approved record. EdiWay AI does not diagnose, determine SEND status, issue EHC plans, calculate unvalidated risk scores or make safeguarding decisions.
Capture the relevant observation, assessment, concern or contribution in the correct information area.
Consider existing permitted learning, SEND, wellbeing or pastoral information.
Invite authorised staff, family members, learners or professionals where appropriate.
Agree the support, action, provision or safeguarding response through the correct human-led process.
Record relevant intervention, provision or follow-up activity.
Consider current evidence and whether the agreed action has been completed or helped.
Record the next authorised step while preserving earlier evidence.
Carry forward only the appropriate information when settings, roles or relationships change.
When SEND, wellbeing and safeguarding information is scattered across documents, spreadsheets, email and separate platforms, schools may struggle to understand:
EdiWay brings related evidence closer together while preserving the boundaries needed for safe, accountable support.
No.
EdiWay helps schools organise educational evidence, support plans, provision, interventions and reviews.
Diagnosis remains the responsibility of appropriately qualified professionals.
EdiWay supports APDR-style educational workflows linking evidence, planning, delivery and review.
The responsible school staff remain accountable for the decisions made within that process.
EdiWay can help organise school-held EHC information, evidence and annual-review preparation.
It does not issue an EHC plan or determine statutory entitlement.
Linked parents and carers may contribute through approved sensory, support, assessment or review workflows where enabled.
Their evidence remains separately attributed and does not automatically become a school finding.
Authorised professionals may contribute through defined learner-specific relationships where that functionality is enabled.
External access remains scoped by purpose, permissions and relationship status.
No.
The sensory workflow records educational and family evidence to help understand patterns, preferences and support approaches.
It is not a clinical diagnostic tool.
No.
Demand and autonomy support focuses on educational barriers, context and helpful strategies.
The platform does not diagnose PDA or calculate a PDA score.
EdiWay supports intervention planning, delivery information, evidence and review.
Where available, reporting may describe recorded progress, delivery and data gaps.
It does not automatically prove that an intervention caused a particular outcome.
EdiWay can support wellbeing check-ins, pastoral records, SEMH context, support actions and review workflows.
It does not diagnose mental-health conditions.
No.
Safeguarding is treated as a separately controlled information area.
Access should be limited according to the user’s authorised safeguarding responsibilities.
No.
An authorised person may decide that information should be referred for safeguarding review, but the original behaviour and safeguarding records remain distinct.
No.
EdiWay can help authorised safeguarding staff organise concerns, chronology, evidence and follow-up.
Safeguarding findings and external decisions remain with trained staff and relevant statutory services.
EdiWay AI should not be used to automatically predict that a learner is at safeguarding risk.
AI may assist with permitted administrative drafting or chronology preparation, but a trained human remains responsible for review and action.
No software automatically creates organisational compliance.
Schools remain responsible for their statutory duties, policies, training, professional practice, information governance and safeguarding procedures.
Schools can begin with relevant available workflows and connect additional SEND, wellbeing, professional-collaboration and safeguarding areas as implementation develops.
Availability may depend on configuration, permissions, subscription and controlled rollout.
Connect academic, educational-profile and support evidence to an appropriately authorised review.
Connect relevant behaviour and pastoral information without automatically turning incidents into SEND or safeguarding findings.
Request family contributions and share approved support information through appropriate communication routes.
Connect appropriate resources, learner work and evidence to agreed educational support.
Invite approved practitioners into defined learner-specific workspaces.
Understand assessment permissions, contribution boundaries, edit history and retention.