Complete school registers, record absence and lateness, review attendance history and coordinate appropriate follow-up from one connected school context.
EdiWay links attendance to the correct learner, class, timetable and school while keeping family communication, pastoral support, SEND and safeguarding workflows appropriately separated.
Attendance is more than a percentage. Schools need to understand whether registers have been completed, why a learner was absent or late, whether information is still missing and what appropriate follow-up has taken place.
EdiWay connects registration with the wider school day while preserving the context behind each attendance record.
Record attendance against the appropriate school day or session.
Connect lesson attendance to the correct class and timetable.
Make sure each attendance record belongs to the correct learner and school relationship.
Record relevant absence information and reasons.
Capture late arrival and appropriate supporting information.
Identify records or actions requiring authorised staff attention.
Connect relevant attendance communication to the correct learner and family relationship.
Give authorised staff a clearer view of attendance information without losing the underlying record context.
Morning and afternoon registration provide the foundation for school attendance. EdiWay gives authorised staff a structured way to complete the appropriate register and identify information requiring further review.
Record the learner’s attendance for the relevant morning session.
Complete the appropriate afternoon registration.
Include learners who belong in the relevant school population rather than applicants, leavers or unrelated records.
Use the learner’s active school and timetable context to understand who should appear.
Record the appropriate attendance status through the school’s configured workflow.
Make incomplete register information visible rather than assuming a learner was present or absent.
Show whether the relevant register remains incomplete or has been submitted.
Allow permitted changes through appropriate attendance workflows. A missing mark should remain visibly unresolved until it is reviewed. It should not silently become an attendance conclusion.
For schools using lesson-level registration, EdiWay can connect attendance to the relevant class, lesson, learners and responsible staff.
Open the register from the correct teaching group.
Connect attendance to the appropriate scheduled period.
Use current class membership rather than a separate attendance list.
Give the assigned teacher or authorised staff member access to the register they need.
Record learner attendance at the relevant teaching session.
Capture a learner arriving after the expected lesson start where appropriate.
Help authorised staff investigate an unexpected absence from a lesson.
Make outstanding lesson registers visible for follow-up. Lesson-level attendance should complement the school’s wider attendance record without creating unrelated versions of the same learner.
Not every school uses exactly the same registration structure. EdiWay can support registration through the appropriate school, tutor, form, class or group context where configured.
Complete registration for the relevant tutor or form group.
Work with appropriately configured year structures.
Use class-based registration where this reflects the school day.
Support more than one relevant registration point where the school requires it.
Keep register access connected to the appropriate staff responsibility.
Use current group relationships to determine who belongs in the register.
Preserve historical attendance when class or group membership changes. A learner moving classes should not rewrite the context of registers completed earlier in the year.
An attendance mark needs enough context to be understood later. EdiWay can support configured attendance codes and associated reasons appropriate to the school’s current attendance processes.
Use the relevant configured coding structure.
Record supporting information explaining the attendance event where appropriate.
Maintain the school’s authorised absence record through the relevant workflow.
Record unauthorised absence according to the school’s approved process.
Distinguish late arrival from ordinary absence.
Preserve appropriate context where the learner is participating in an authorised activity.
Allow proportionate additional information where required.
Schools remain responsible for ensuring that attendance codes and practices reflect the current requirements that apply to them. EdiWay can support the configured workflow but should not present a code as valid merely because it exists in the platform.
An absence record often develops after the register is first taken. The original mark may require additional information, communication or authorised review.
Record that the learner is not present at the expected attendance point.
Add relevant absence information when it becomes available.
Record or connect appropriate communication with the learner’s parent or carer.
Maintain relevant evidence through the appropriate workflow where required.
Record the authorised school decision about the absence where applicable.
Assign an appropriate next action where more information is needed.
Allow authorised staff to update the record when verified information becomes available.
Preserve appropriate context when an attendance record is corrected.
We do not yet know why the learner is absent
from:
The school has reviewed the information and classified the absence.
Lateness can be important operational information without automatically becoming a judgement about the learner or family.
Record the relevant late-arrival information where required.
Connect the late record to the appropriate session or lesson.
Record a relevant reason where supplied or required.
Retain appropriate information about who recorded the event.
Connect relevant parent or carer communication.
Allow authorised staff to review recorded patterns over an appropriate period.
Record agreed school actions where further review is required.
Allow authorised adjustment when the original information was incorrect. Repeated lateness can prompt a human review. It should not generate an automatic conclusion about the learner, family circumstances or safeguarding risk.
Attendance reporting is only useful when the underlying registers are sufficiently complete. EdiWay can help authorised staff identify registration activity requiring attention.
Identify expected registers that have not yet been completed.
Highlight learners whose attendance status remains unresolved.
Show relevant registration workflows that remain open.
Make clear who is expected to complete or review the register.
Allow appropriate actions or reminders to be coordinated.
Identify attendance records that have been returned for review.
Make incomplete attendance information visible before it is relied upon in wider reporting.
Allow authorised leaders to understand where registration processes remain incomplete. A completed-looking dashboard should not hide unfinished registers underneath it.
A learner’s attendance history can help authorised staff understand their recorded school participation across an appropriate period.
Review relevant morning and afternoon information.
See lesson-level history where the school uses that workflow.
Review recorded absences and their relevant classification.
Understand recorded late-arrival information over time.
Preserve appropriate information about supported changes.
Review attendance within the relevant term, year or defined reporting period.
Keep attendance connected to the school relationship in which it occurred.
Distinguish current attendance concerns from older school records. Historical attendance provides useful context. It should not automatically determine the action required today.
Attendance information can help authorised staff identify learners whose recorded attendance warrants further human review. EdiWay can bring together appropriate attendance information without pretending that a percentage explains why a learner is absent.
Review the learner’s recorded attendance within a defined period.
Understand how often absence has been recorded.
Review relevant late-arrival information.
Compare appropriate periods where the underlying data supports it.
Check whether missing marks limit the interpretation.
Allow authorised users to consider relevant school information where they have permission.
See whether appropriate communication or follow-up has taken place.
Identify meetings, information requests or reviews still requiring attention. EdiWay can help staff identify information that deserves review. It does not automatically determine the cause of absence or the correct intervention.
Where a learner’s recorded attendance reaches a school or policy-defined level requiring additional attention, authorised staff need a clearer route from data to review.
Make clear which attendance period is being considered.
Use sufficiently complete registration data.
Review the information recorded against relevant absences.
Identify unresolved absence or register records.
See relevant attendance actions already completed.
Review approved communication and contributions.
Consider permitted pastoral, SEND or wellbeing information where it is relevant.
Allow an appropriately authorised person to decide what should happen next. Schools remain responsible for applying current attendance guidance and thresholds. EdiWay should not use an unexplained algorithm to label a learner as an attendance risk.
Where attendance requires further support, schools need more than a dashboard alert. EdiWay can help authorised users organise appropriate attendance follow-up where those workflows are enabled.
Record relevant contact and agreed next steps.
Include an appropriate learner perspective where useful.
Organise an attendance-focused meeting and its follow-up.
Assign tasks to the appropriate person.
Record agreed approaches through the relevant school workflow.
Make clear when attendance or support should be reconsidered.
Record what happened following the action.
Allow authorised staff to move information into another relevant process where required. Attendance support remains a human-led process. The platform helps organise the information and agreed actions around that work.
Attendance communication should use current learner and family relationships.
Respect relevant relationship, contact and information-sharing restrictions.
Send appropriate information to linked parents or carers where enabled.
Ask for relevant absence information through the appropriate communication route.
Share permitted lateness information where the school’s process requires it.
Arrange attendance conversations and reviews.
Communicate agreed actions or next steps.
Recognise meaningful improvement where appropriate.
Use the correct approved recipient rather than assuming every linked adult has identical communication rights.
Retain appropriate attendance-related communication where the workflow supports it.
Linked parents and carers can receive an appropriate view of attendance information relating to their child where enabled.
View approved school attendance information.
See relevant absence details made available by the school.
Respond when the school needs additional context.
Receive appropriate attendance messages.
See relevant agreed next steps.
Move between linked learners without mixing attendance records.
Receive information according to the approved relationship with the learner.
Access only the attendance information the school has made available for the appropriate period. Families do not automatically receive internal attendance notes, information about other learners or restricted safeguarding records.
Attendance and behaviour information may both form part of a learner’s school experience. They remain different records.
Shows school participation and relevant registration information.
Describes recorded behaviour events, achievements or pastoral responses.
Authorised staff may consider both where there is a legitimate educational purpose.
A behaviour event should not automatically change an attendance record.
Absence does not prove a behaviour concern.
Relevant evidence can inform an appropriate human-led support discussion.
Neither attendance nor behaviour automatically establishes a safeguarding finding.
Learners with SEND may experience barriers that affect school attendance. Relevant support information can be considered by authorised staff without exposing the full SEND record to every attendance user.
Review permitted information about agreed support where relevant.
Understand appropriate learner experience and barriers.
Consider relevant parent or carer context.
Connect approved attendance-related actions to the appropriate support workflow.
Consider relevant support that has been delivered.
Allow the SENCO or other authorised person to participate where needed.
Keep detailed SEND evidence restricted to users with an appropriate role. Attendance patterns do not diagnose SEND or establish the cause of absence.
Attendance may sometimes change alongside a learner’s wellbeing or pastoral circumstances. EdiWay can help authorised staff connect relevant information when there is a legitimate purpose and appropriate permission.
Identify recorded changes that may warrant conversation.
Review permitted relevant context.
Use appropriate learner voice where enabled.
Consider approved family information.
Connect attendance to suitable pastoral follow-up.
Record what authorised staff decided to do next.
Keep sensitive wellbeing records out of general attendance views unless access is appropriate. A change in attendance is a signal to review the context. It is not a mental-health diagnosis.
Attendance concerns may sometimes form part of a safeguarding picture. The decision to treat information as a safeguarding concern must remain with appropriately authorised people.
Keep the original attendance record in its proper context.
Allow authorised staff to follow the school’s safeguarding process where necessary.
Keep safeguarding review within the restricted safeguarding domain.
Do not make safeguarding chronology visible to ordinary attendance users.
Allow trained staff to determine whether further safeguarding action is required.
Keep safeguarding decisions and follow-up inside the correct controlled workflow. EdiWay does not automa ically infer neglect, abuse or safeguarding risk from attendance data.
Where a learner receives education outside the ordinary school timetable, attendance information may need a different workflow.
Identify the relevant provision or education provider.
Record appropriate participation or delivery information.
Keep the school or authority context visible where applicable.
Distinguish alternative provision from ordinary on-site school attendance.
Preserve the source of relevant attendance information.
Identify missing or incomplete provider information.
Use appropriate provision and progress workflows rather than assuming school registration alone explains participation.
Maintain relevant historical context where a learner returns to a school timetable.
Attendance concerns may sometimes form part of a safeguarding picture. The decision to treat information as a safeguarding concern must remain with appropriately authorised people.
Limit attendance corrections to users with the appropriate responsibility.
Retain suitable historical context for supported changes.
Record an explanation for material corrections where the workflow requires it.
Keep appropriate information about who made the change.
Preserve when the correction occurred.
Make the current attendance record clear.
Connect relevant supporting information where appropriate.
Allow unusual or significant changes to be reviewed by an authorised user. Corrections should improve the record without silently erasing important history.
Attendance dashboards can look precise even when important registration information is missing. EdiWay can help make data-quality problems visible.
Identify attendance points that remain unfinished.
Show unresolved records.
Highlight inappropriate or inconsistent register membership for review.
Identify potential duplicated attendance records.
Make attendance linked to the wrong period or school context visible for correction.
Prevent former learners from continuing to distort current attendance populations.
Make the effective start of the school relationship clear.
Preserve the correct context when classes or teaching arrangements change.
Make authorised updates visible to appropriate reviewers.
Indicate when missing information materially limits a report. Attendance reporting should expose important data gaps rather than hiding them inside a percentage.
Authorised school users may need attendance information for individual learners, groups, classes or the wider organisation. Useful reporting should make the scope clear.
Review attendance history for an authorised learner and defined period.
Understand attendance within an appropriate class context.
Review relevant information for a defined cohort.
Provide authorised leadership oversight of the current learner population.
Make the dates or academic period explicit.
Explain what is included in the calculation.
Show when incomplete registers affect interpretation.
Allow authorised users to understand appropriate recorded reasons.
Compare permitted populations carefully.
Move from a report to the learners or actions requiring authorised attention. A percentage is only meaningful when its population, dates and underlying data are understood.
School leaders need attendance oversight without having to inspect every register individually. EdiWay can help authorised leaders understand:
Which relevant registers remain incomplete?
What does the recorded school attendance picture show?
Which attendance records remain unresolved?
Are there repeated late-arrival patterns requiring review?
Which learners meet the school’s defined criteria for further attention?
Has relevant follow-up been recorded?
Are attendance-related actions complete or overdue?
Is incomplete information limiting the school-level picture?
How has recorded attendance changed across appropriate periods? Leadership information should point towards the next human action rather than simply create more statistics.
Complete relevant class, lesson, tutor or session registers and review learners within their assigned scope.
Review absence information, lateness, incomplete records and relevant follow-up.
Use appropriate attendance context when coordinating learner support.
Consider attendance alongside permitted SEND information where relevant.
Review attendance information where it forms part of an authorised safeguarding process.
Access appropriate school-level attendance oversight and reporting.
Maintain relevant learner, registration and attendance information.
Access attendance information approved for their linked child.
See age-appropriate attendance information where enabled.
Attendance is connected to the learner record, but that connection does not open every other information area.
Attendance belongs to the relevant school context.
Users access attendance only for appropriate learners.
Teachers can be limited to assigned teaching groups.
Different attendance actions can be available to different staff.
Viewing a register does not necessarily permit historical correction.
School-level reporting should be limited to authorised roles.
Parents and carers access only the information approved for their learner relationship.
Sensitive support information remains separately permissioned.
Safeguarding chronology remains separately controlled.
Where enabled, EdiWay AI may help authorised users prepare working drafts from attendance information they already have permission to access.
Prepare a concise summary of selected recorded information.
Help prepare appropriate attendance messages for human review.
Organise relevant permitted attendance information before a review.
Draft an overview of actions already recorded.
Highlight unresolved fields or incomplete context.
Help authorised users understand the information shown in a selected attendance report. Every AI output remains a draft requiring human review.
Identify the school, date, session, lesson, class and expected learners.
Record the relevant attendance information.
Keep unresolved marks and incomplete registers visible.
Record appropriate absence or lateness information.
Contact the correct family member where required and enabled.
Allow authorised attendance or pastoral staff to consider repeated or significant concerns.
Connect appropriate actions, meetings or wider support where necessary.
Move relevant information into SEND, wellbeing or safeguarding workflows only through an authorised human decision.
Use sufficiently complete attendance information for individual, cohort or leadership review.
Retain appropriate context when attendance records are corrected or the learner changes setting.
When attendance information is spread across paper registers, spreadsheets, emails and separate systems, staff may need to work out:
EdiWay connects the attendance record to the wider learner and school context while keeping the interpretation and response with authorised people.
EdiWay supports core school-registration workflows including morning, afternoon and lesson attendance, with tutor, group or additional attendance points available according to school configuration.
Yes.
Lesson registers can be connected to the relevant class, timetable and assigned learners.
EdiWay supports recording lateness and associated context such as an appropriate reason where required.
Attendance workflows can support relevant absence classification according to the school’s configured processes.
Schools remain responsible for applying current attendance requirements and determining the appropriate classification.
EdiWay supports configured attendance coding and reason structures.
Schools remain responsible for ensuring their configuration reflects the current requirements applying to their setting.
Attendance reporting can help authorised users identify learners meeting configured or current review criteria.
The underlying attendance data should be sufficiently complete, and the school remains responsible for applying current guidance and deciding what action is appropriate.
The public product should not be positioned as automatically predicting which learners will become absent.
Attendance information can support human-led review of recorded patterns and circumstances.
Attendance communication can be sent to linked parents or carers where the relevant communication workflow is enabled.
Recipient selection should respect current family relationships and information-sharing controls.
Family responses or information requests may be supported through enabled communication workflows.
The school remains responsible for reviewing the information and updating the attendance record appropriately.
Relevant attendance context can be considered within an authorised SEND review.
Attendance does not diagnose SEND or automatically reveal the learner’s complete SEND record to attendance users.
No.
An authorised person may decide that attendance information requires safeguarding review, but attendance does not automatically establish neglect, abuse or other safeguarding findings.
Authorised safeguarding users may use relevant attendance information where it forms part of their responsibilities.
Ordinary attendance access does not provide access to the safeguarding record.
AI should not automatically label a learner as vulnerable or predict safeguarding risk from attendance.
Where enabled, AI can assist with drafting, summarising and preparation from permitted information.
Home education should not be represented as ordinary school attendance.
Parent-led routines and learning records belong within the home-education pathway.
EOTAS participation or provision records should remain separate from ordinary school registration.
The exact workflow depends on the enabled education pathway and responsibility model.
Authorised corrections can be supported, with appropriate context around material changes where enabled.
Authorised leaders can review appropriate school-level attendance information according to their role, data readiness and reporting configuration.
EdiWay should not be assumed to provide a live official government submission connection unless that specific workflow has been implemented, tested and documented.
The school remains responsible for its official reporting and statutory responsibilities.
No software automatically creates organisational compliance.
Schools remain responsible for their policies, attendance practice, current guidance, staff decisions and statutory duties.
Schools can begin with relevant available registration and attendance workflows and connect communication, pastoral support, reporting and other areas as implementation develops.
Feature availability may depend on configuration, permissions, subscription and controlled rollout.
Use the active learner, school and family context that underpins attendance.
Connect registers to the correct teaching groups, learners and school day.
Contact linked families and coordinate appropriate attendance follow-up.
Consider permitted behaviour and pastoral context without treating attendance as a behavioural conclusion.
Connect relevant attendance evidence to controlled support workflows when an authorised person decides it is appropriate.
Review attendance, missing registers, data quality and school-level information.
EdiWay is undergoing active development and live testing.
Participating schools can explore available registers, attendance records, absence, lateness, communication and reporting workflows and provide practical feedback.
Some automated communication, specialised reporting, external data exchange, mobile experiences, alternative-provision workflows and advanced attendance functionality may require additional configuration, remain under development or be available through controlled rollout.