Keep school-held EHC plan information, outcomes, provision, learner voice, family contributions, professional evidence and annual review preparation connected to the learner journey. EdiWay helps SENCOs and authorised staff organise the evidence around an EHC plan without confusing the school’s record with the statutory plan held and determined through the responsible authority.
Schools may need a structured view of the EHC plan information relevant to teaching, provision and review. EdiWay can help organise that school-held record around:
Maintain appropriate identifying and date context.
Keep relevant structured information available to authorised users.
Record the outcomes contained within the school-held plan information.
Maintain the provision the school needs to understand and deliver.
Connect relevant school, learner, family and professional information.
Keep annual review activity connected to the plan.
Preserve appropriate earlier information when the plan or school-held record changes. The EdiWay record supports the school’s work around the EHC plan. EdiWay does not issue, amend or replace the statutory EHC plan.
EHC plan outcomes and provision are more useful when responsible staff can understand how they relate to the learner’s current support.
Maintain relevant school-held EHC plan outcomes.
Record the provision described in the plan.
Connect additional school support without pretending it forms part of the statutory plan.
Make relevant delivery responsibility visible.
Connect structured interventions where they contribute to an outcome.
Surface approved practical information to appropriate teaching staff.
Connect suitable review evidence.
Make clear when information needs to be reconsidered. Statutory EHC provision and school-added support should remain distinguishable.
Annual review preparation can involve information held across several areas of school activity. EdiWay can bring relevant evidence into one review context.
Review the outcomes currently recorded.
Consider the provision the school understands it should be delivering.
Connect relevant assessment and progress information.
Review structured support and recorded delivery.
Include appropriate classroom observations.
Capture what the learner thinks about current support and future priorities.
Invite relevant family contributions.
Connect contributions from authorised professionals.
Use appropriate contextual evidence where relevant.
Connect suitable supporting records. The aim is to reduce last-minute evidence gathering while keeping each contribution connected to its source.
The learner’s own experience can provide important context for an annual review. Where appropriate, EdiWay can help capture:
What does the learner feel is working?
What would they like adults to understand?
Which strategies or provision do they find useful?
What are their current priorities?
What would they like to do more independently?
What matters to them for the future?
What would they like the review to consider? Learner voice should be gathered in a way appropriate to age, communication and individual circumstances. It should remain identifiable as the learner’s contribution.
Parents and carers may hold important evidence about progress, support, changing needs and future priorities. EdiWay can support appropriate family contributions before a review.
What does the family feel is going well?
What needs additional discussion?
What is their experience of the support currently in place?
What changes have they observed?
What would they like the review to consider?
What future outcomes matter to the learner and family?
Provide appropriate information where enabled.
Keep the contribution attributed to the parent or carer. A family contribution informs the review. It does not automatically become the school’s judgement or a statutory amendment.
Educational psychologists, speech and language therapists, occupational therapists and other authorised professionals may contribute evidence relevant to the learner’s EHC plan review. EdiWay can connect those contributions through purpose-scoped professional relationships.
Keep professional involvement learner-specific.
Record why the professional is contributing.
Preserve professional reports and observations.
Keep advice connected to its original author.
Link appropriate evidence to relevant EHC outcomes.
Connect recommendations where they relate to support.
Include suitable professional views in review preparation.
Limit the professional to the information required for their role. Professional evidence should retain its source and authority. It should not silently become a school-authored or local-authority decision.
EdiWay can help organise the school’s annual review activity around the learner and current EHC plan record.
Keep the planned review point visible.
Record appropriate attendees.
Include the learner where appropriate.
Preserve relevant family involvement.
Connect authorised practitioners.
Identify the information available to the meeting.
Record appropriate school-held review information.
Assign agreed follow-up tasks.
Connect relevant review records.
Preserve earlier annual review activity. The platform supports review preparation and record organisation. The responsible statutory process remains outside EdiWay’s decision-making authority.
Following a review, the school may need to maintain actions and updated evidence.
Record work assigned to relevant staff.
Update appropriate school provision where authorised.
Identify information still required.
Connect further contributions where appropriate.
Share suitable school-held information.
Record age-appropriate next steps.
Preserve the school’s account of the review.
Record the relevant authoritative decision when received through the proper process.
Those decisions remain with the responsible statutory process.
EHC plan information can change over time. Schools may still need to understand what applied at an earlier point.
Retain appropriate historical outcome information.
Keep earlier provision distinguishable from current provision.
Maintain review history.
Preserve learner, family and professional evidence within its original context.
Connect relevant historical records.
Make current school-held information clear.
Keep authoritative information distinguishable from school-created notes.
Allow authorised users to understand significant changes over time. Historical information provides context. It should not continue appearing as current instruction after it has been superseded.
For older learners, annual reviews may increasingly need to consider independence, participation and future pathways. Where supported, EdiWay can connect relevant evidence around areas such as:
Consider future learning pathways.
Record relevant learner goals.
Capture age-appropriate skills and priorities.
Consider communication for greater independence.
Connect appropriate future-planning evidence.
Maintain relevant support context where enabled.
Keep the learner’s own priorities central.
Connect selected evidence to the next setting or pathway. Preparation for Adulthood functionality may remain subject to controlled rollout and further runtime testing.
Annual reviews may draw on evidence created by different people and workflows.
Academic, classroom and support information.
Views and relevant learner-created material.
Parent and carer contributions.
Reports and recommendations from authorised practitioners.
Recorded delivery and review information.
Relevant academic or educational-profile information.
Connect appropriate reports and supporting files.
Preserve the author, source, and date where available. Connecting evidence should not remove the distinction between who observed something and who has authority to make a decision.
EHC plan information may contain sensitive educational, health and professional evidence. EdiWay can separate classroom-useful information from more restricted review material.
See relevant strategies, adjustments and provision required for their responsibility.
Access the wider school-held EHC record and review evidence.
Receive appropriate oversight according to role.
Contribute and access information approved for their learner relationship.
Participate through age-appropriate workflows.
Contribute within a defined learner relationship and purpose.
Where enabled, EdiWay AI can help authorised staff organise information they already have permission to access.
Prepare a source-aware working summary.
Organise relevant outcomes, provision and evidence.
Help present approved information more clearly.
Prepare review-related communication for human checking.
Draft structured notes from permitted information.
Highlight evidence that may still need review. Every AI output remains a draft requiring authorised human review.
Review the school-held EHC plan information, outcomes and provision.
Connect relevant academic, support and intervention information.
Gather appropriate learner, parent, carer and professional views.
Identify missing evidence and outstanding contributions.
Bring the available information into the appropriate meeting context.
Assign the school’s agreed follow-up.
Keep the evidence and school-held review record connected to the learner.
Update the school-held EHC information when the appropriate statutory decision or amended plan is received.
EdiWay can maintain structured school-held information relating to an EHC plan, including relevant outcomes, provision, evidence and review history.
No.
EdiWay supports school workflows around evidence and review.
It does not issue the statutory EHC plan.
EdiWay can help organise annual review preparation, evidence, participants, contributions, actions and school-held review history.
Yes, where the appropriate family workflow is enabled.
Their contribution remains identifiable as family evidence.
Age-appropriate learner voice can be gathered and connected to the review.
Authorised professionals can contribute through defined learner-specific relationships where enabled.
Relevant school-held outcomes can be maintained and connected to supporting evidence and review activity.
Yes.
School-held information about relevant EHC plan provision can be maintained and connected to wider support workflows.
Not automatically.
Teachers may need appropriate provision, adjustments or strategies without unrestricted access to sensitive professional or statutory evidence.
No.
Statutory decisions remain with the responsible authority and authorised statutory process.
No.
EdiWay does not determine statutory eligibility.
Yes.
Relevant structured interventions can be connected to learner outcomes and later review evidence.
Appropriate academic assessment and progress information can contribute to a review where relevant.
Relevant future-planning information may be supported where enabled.
Some Preparation for Adulthood workflows remain subject to further testing and controlled rollout.
AI may help prepare working drafts or evidence summaries where enabled.
An authorised person remains responsible for reviewing the content and completing the school’s part of the process.
The website should not assume a live local-authority integration or official statutory exchange unless that specific connection has been implemented, tested and documented.
Schools can begin with relevant available EHC evidence and annual-review workflows and connect wider professional, family and transition functionality as implementation develops.
Availability may depend on configuration, permissions and controlled rollout.
Connect school support, reasonable adjustments and provision to the learner’s wider SEND journey.
Bring structured intervention delivery and review evidence into the annual review.
Connect relevant baseline and later academic evidence.
Keep intervention evidence inside the wider human-led support journey.
Connect reviewed outcomes and future priorities to the learner’s next setting or pathway.
Include appropriate purpose-scoped professional evidence where required.
EdiWay is undergoing active development and live testing.
Participating schools can explore available EHC record, outcome, provision, contribution, evidence and annual review workflows.
Some automated reminders, professional contributions, evidence-pack generation, Preparation for Adulthood, external sharing and local-authority collaboration may require additional configuration, remain under development or be available through controlled rollout.