Plan structured educational interventions, assign responsibility, schedule delivery, connect evidence and review learner progress within one permission-aware workflow. EdiWay helps schools distinguish the support they intended to provide from what actually happened - giving SENCOs and authorised staff clearer evidence for the next human-led decision.
Provision and Support Planning defines what support the learner needs. The intervention workflow focuses on a structured programme used to deliver part of that support.
Record the specific programme or support activity.
Connect it to the learner outcome or educational need being addressed.
Record an appropriate baseline.
Define the intended educational change.
Identify who coordinates or delivers the intervention.
Plan relevant sessions or delivery periods.
Connect suitable learner and delivery evidence.
Set a clear point for human evaluation. An intervention should have enough structure to answer: What were we trying to do?, What was actually delivered?, What evidence do we now have?
Each intervention can connect to the learner and wider support journey.
Keep the intervention connected to the correct learner.
Identify the programme or support approach being used.
Connect the intervention to an appropriate learner outcome.
Record relevant starting information.
Maintain the intended measure or educational goal.
Keep the intervention time-aware.
Make ownership clear.
Record the intended frequency or session pattern.
Distinguish planned, active, completed and reviewed activity. Creating an intervention does not automatically determine that the learner has SEND or that a particular programme is professionally appropriate. The intervention remains an authorised educational decision.
Structured interventions often depend on regular delivery. EdiWay can help schools organise that activity.
Maintain the intended intervention schedule.
Identify the person responsible for delivery.
Keep the programme connected to the appropriate learner.
Make planned delivery explicit.
Record relevant location, group or delivery context where configured.
Keep non-delivery visible.
Allow authorised staff to organise replacement activity where appropriate.
Keep the intervention’s next review date visible. A planned session is not evidence that the session actually took place.
A meaningful impact review depends on knowing what support actually occurred.
Record that the planned intervention activity took place.
Preserve when it was delivered.
Keep the delivery record connected to the relevant person.
Record appropriate participation information.
Add proportionate educational context where useful.
Connect relevant supporting information.
Make cancelled or undelivered sessions visible.
Understand the amount of recorded intervention delivery over the review period. This distinction matters. Planned provision tells the school what should happen. Delivery evidence shows what was recorded as happening.
Intervention review can bring together three useful reference points.
What was the learner’s recorded position before or at the start of the intervention?
What educational change was the intervention intended to support?
What does the relevant evidence show at review?
Keep the assessment or measure being used explicit.
Preserve when each measure was recorded.
Show where baseline, target or review evidence is incomplete.
Avoid treating unrelated measures as though they represent the same outcome. The numbers can support review. They do not make the professional judgement.
Intervention review may draw on several types of educational information.
Connect relevant attainment or progress evidence.
Use suitable evidence from classroom activity.
Include appropriate professional observations.
Review what was actually delivered.
Ask whether the learner found the support useful.
Include relevant parent and carer observations where appropriate.
Connect authorised contributions from external professionals.
Keep the intervention connected to the wider learner plan. Evidence should remain connected to its source rather than being copied into an unexplained intervention summary.
EdiWay can help authorised staff compare planned support, recorded delivery and learner evidence. The final interpretation remains human-led.
Has the relevant measure changed?
How does the current evidence compare with the intended target?
Was enough of the planned intervention recorded as delivered to support a meaningful review?
What does the learner say about the support?
What has been observed in the classroom?
Show where baseline, target or review evidence is incomplete.
Is important evidence missing?
What does the authorised reviewer conclude?
A learner improving after an intervention does not automatically prove the intervention caused the improvement. A learner showing limited progress does not automatically prove the intervention was ineffective. EdiWay supports descriptive, human-reviewed impact evidence, not automated causal claims.
The intervention workspace can help authorised users identify information requiring attention.
Has the planned review date passed?
Were planned sessions not recorded?
Was substantially less support delivered than intended?
Is there no suitable starting measure?
Is review evidence incomplete?
How does the current position compare with the intended target?
Does the available measure show no change during the selected period?
Is there insufficient supporting information for a confident human review? These are review signals. They are not automatic conclusions about the learner or the quality of the intervention.
At review, an authorised member of staff can consider the evidence and record the next educational step.
Maintain the intervention where it remains appropriate.
Change frequency, strategy, target or delivery approach.
Move to a different authorised support approach.
Close the intervention when its purpose has been fulfilled or the programme ends.
Review the learner’s wider provision.
Gather additional classroom, family or professional information.
Consider an appropriate further educational or professional review.
Keep the authorised review decision connected to the evidence considered. EdiWay does not automatically decide which intervention the learner should receive next.
Authorised SENCOs and leaders may need an overview of intervention activity. EdiWay can support descriptive information such as:
Understand the current recorded programme population.
Review recorded delivery activity.
Identify interventions requiring attention.
Review appropriate recorded progress information.
Understand whether review evidence is present.
Review activity across suitable programme groups.
Consider frequency and recorded dosage.
Include appropriate mapped provision or delivery-cost information where configured.
Make incomplete information visible. Reporting should describe recorded intervention activity. It should not claim that one intervention has been scientifically proven more effective than another from ordinary school operational data.
Defines the learner’s wider outcomes, strategies, adjustments and agreed support.
Tracks a specific structured programme used within that support.
Explains the wider educational goal.
Defines the specific focus of the programme.Move to a different authorised support approach.
Considers whether the learner’s overall support remains appropriate.
Considers delivery and evidence from the structured programme. The intervention should feed evidence back into the wider support review.
Academic assessment can provide useful baseline or review evidence.
Use relevant assessment where appropriate.
Connect later academic evidence.
Keep the measure tied to the correct learning area.
Connect the programme to the intended educational outcome.
Make missing or incomparable assessment information visible.
Allow authorised staff to interpret the relationship. Assessment can support intervention review. It should not automatically trigger an intervention or determine whether it should continue.
Coordinate evidence, plans, provision and review.
Contribute appropriate classroom evidence and understand relevant learner support.
Access assigned interventions, sessions and appropriate learner context.
Review authorised delivery and intervention information.
Contribute relevant evidence or receive approved updates where enabled.
Provide age-appropriate feedback on their experience.
Contribute within a defined learner relationship where appropriate. Access to an intervention does not automatically provide unrestricted access to the learner’s wider SEND, medical or safeguarding record.
Where enabled, EdiWay AI may help authorised users prepare drafts using intervention information they already have permission to access.
Organise selected delivery and progress evidence.
Prepare a source-aware working overview.
Highlight relevant information for human review.
Prepare clearer updates for authorised checking.
Identify gaps that may need attention. AI outputs remain drafts requiring authorised human review.
Connect an authorised programme to the learner and support outcome.
Record an appropriate baseline and intended target.
Identify the staff responsible for delivery.
Set the expected delivery pattern.
Capture what actually happened.
Bring together relevant assessment, learner and classroom information.
Compare the available evidence with the original purpose and recorded delivery.
Allow the authorised reviewer to continue, adjust, conclude or return to wider support planning.
Keep the earlier intervention and review evidence within the learner journey.
Schools may know that an intervention was placed on a learner’s plan without being able to answer:
EdiWay connects those parts of the intervention journey so authorised staff can make a more informed review.
Intervention tracking software helps schools organise structured support programmes, including the learner, intended outcome, staff responsibility, planned delivery, recorded sessions, evidence and review.
Planned intervention sessions and staff assignment can be supported within the intervention workflow.
Yes.
Recorded delivery can be maintained separately from the original planned schedule.
Baseline, current and target measures can contribute to a human-led progress review where the relevant workflow is enabled.
EdiWay can provide descriptive evidence around delivery, progress and review.
It should not claim that ordinary operational data proves an intervention caused a learner’s progress.
Recorded delivery information can make missing or incomplete session activity visible.
Yes.
A structured intervention can connect to a wider outcome or provision plan without duplicating the complete support record.
Relevant academic assessment can contribute baseline or later progress evidence where appropriate.
Relevant family evidence can form part of an authorised review where that workflow is enabled.
Age-appropriate learner feedback can be included where appropriate.
Appropriate delivery or mapped-provision cost context may be available where configured.
Cost does not determine educational effectiveness.
No.
Intervention activity does not automatically determine SEND status.
AI should not autonomously choose the intervention a learner receives.
It may assist authorised staff with summaries and preparation where enabled.
Current public positioning should remain descriptive and human-reviewed.
Intervention analytics should not be presented as predictive machine learning or causal effectiveness analysis.
Authorised users may review bounded descriptive information by intervention type where supported.
Such comparisons require careful interpretation because learner populations, delivery and context may differ.
Yes.
An authorised reviewer can record the appropriate next step based on the evidence available.
No.
EdiWay organises intervention planning, delivery and evidence.
Educational interpretation and support decisions remain with authorised people.
Define the wider learner outcome, provision and support that the intervention contributes to.
Use reviewed educational evidence when considering appropriate support.
Connect relevant baseline and later academic evidence.Connect authorised specialist evidence and recommendations.
Keep intervention evidence inside the wider human-led support journey.
Bring classroom evidence and approved support information into the intervention review.
Include appropriate purpose-scoped professional evidence where required.Control SEND evidence, classroom visibility, family participation and professional access.
EdiWay is undergoing active development and live testing.
Participating schools can explore available intervention planning, scheduling, delivery, evidence and human-reviewed impact workflows.
Some cost reporting, cohort analysis, exports, notification, linked-evidence and advanced reporting features may require additional configuration, remain under development or be available through controlled rollout.